ETHICS AND ETIQUETTE
Abstract
The article attempts to differentiate and even contrast the two different models of moral thinking and behavior. One of them considered morality as strict and even rigorist following etiquette - rules, rituals, commandments, laws, canons. Breach of the etiquette or neglecting it is considered unethical, a manifestation of immorality, wickedness. Thus, etiquette and morality are identified. Such a conception of morality results from the ethical paradigm of Aristotle. But there is another, opposite paradigm - the ethics of Kant, in which morality is understood not as a form of behavior, but as an ontological entity. And in this (Kantian) moral paradigm etiquette has only to a service value.
About the Authors
N. A. NekrasovaRussian Federation
F. A. Trigubenko
Russian Federation
References
1. Aristotel'. Nikomahova jetika. Sochinenija: v 4-h t. Pod obshh. red. A.I. Dovatura. Per. s drevne-grech. N.V. Braginskoj. M.: Mysl'. 1984. T. 3. 420 p. (In Russian).
2. Asmus V.F. Immanuil Kant. M.: Vysshaya shkola. 2005. 380 p. (In Russian).
3. Gusejnov A.A. Jetika Aristotelja. M.: Znanie. 1984. 34 p. (In Russian).
4. Gusejnov A.A. Moral' i razum. URL: http://sbiblio.com/biblio/archive/guseynov_mora/ (data obrashhenija 10.11.2014). (In Russian).
5. Kant I. Lekcii po jetike. pod obshh. Red., sost. i vstup. st. A.A. Gusejnova. Per. s nem. A.K. Sudakova, V.V. Krylovoj. M.: Respublika. 2000. 512 p. (In Russian).
6. Maksimov L.V. Problema obosnovanija morali: logiko-kognitivnye aspekty. M.: Mysl'. 1991. 242 p. (In Russian).
7. Mamardashvili M. Kantianskie variacii. Pod red. Ju.P. Senokosova. M.: Agraf. 1997. 214 p. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Nekrasova N.A., Trigubenko F.A. ETHICS AND ETIQUETTE. Civil Aviation High Technologies. 2015;(215):99-104. (In Russ.)