THE METHODOLOGY FOR THE SYNTHESIS AND CORRECTION OF THE "RISK PYRAMIDS" IN THE AIRPLANE SEGMENT OF COMMERCIAL AVIATION OF RUSSIA

The article presents the results of the "risk pyramids" analysis of commercial aviation for their adequacy to the current state of the aviation transport system of Russia. The necessity of annual updating of "risk pyramids" is shown, as the aviation transport system (ATS) of Russia is dynamic and the ATS state changes faster than the accident rate statistical indicators characterizing this state. The method of linear weighted moving average for the synthesis and annual correction of the "risk pyramids" parameters with an optimized averaging coefficient – 7 years is substantiated and proposed. The optimization of the averaging coefficient is performed by the criterion of the minimum mismatch between the averaged values of the "risk pyramids" parameters and the current (annual) values determined by the statistical data of an aviation events. The general and private "risk pyramids" of commercial aviation of Russia synthesized by results of the statistical factorial analysis of aviation events for 2009–2016 are presented. The synthesis of "risk pyramids" is made in accordance with the classification of aviation events in the civil aviation of Russia, separately by causative factors: "Human", "Aircraft", "Environment". The parameters of the "risk pyramids" reflect the conditional probability of an aviation event of great severity (for example, a catastrophe), if there were aviation events of less severity (for example, incidents).  The parameters of the presented pyramids are intended for inclusion into the algorithms of indirect estimation of probability of aviation accidents for any airline and any period of flight work (from a month or more).

risk pyramid, aviation events, statistics, factor analysis, correction, probability assessment, flight safety

1. Guzij, A.G. and Grudzinskij, A.V. (2007). Teorija i praktika kolichestvennogo ocenivanija riska aviacionnogo proisshestvija [Theory and practice of quantitative evaluation of the risk of an aircraft accident]. Problemy bezopasnosti poljotov [Flight Safety Problems], no. 9, pp. 10–18. (in Russian)

2. Guzij, A.G, Lushkin, A.M. and Chujko, T.A. (2009). Apriornoe ocenivanie verojatnosti aviacionnogo sobytija v sisteme upravlenija bezopasnost'ju poletov aviakompanii [Apriori assessment of the probability of an aviation event in the airline's safety management system]. Problemy bezopasnosti poljotov [Flight Safety Problems], no. 2, pp. 3–10. (in Russian)

3. Guzij, A.G. and Chujko, T.A. (2009). Verojatnostnyj podhod k ocenivaniju tekushhego urovnja bezopasnosti poletov jekspluatanta vozdushnyh sudov [Probabilistic approach to the assessment of the current level of safety of the aircraft operator]. Razrabotka i vnedrenie korporativnoj sistemy upravlenija bezopasnost'ju poljotov. Materialy otkrytoj nauchno-praktich. konf. aviakompanii «TRANSAJERO» 23 oktjabrja 2008 g. / pod obshhej red. A.G. Guzija [Materials of open Sci.-Pract. Conf. the airline "TRANSAERO" "Development and implementation of corporate system of safety management" on October 23, 2008. Ed. by A. G. Guzij]. Moscow: "RPA "APR", pр. 43–51. (in Russian)

4. Zubkov, B.V. and Sharov, V.D. (2010). Teorija i praktika opredelenija riskov v aviapredprijatijah pri razrabotke sistemy upravlenija bezopasnost'ju poletov [Theory and practice of determining risks in aviation enterprises in the development of safety management system]. Moscow: MSTU CA, 196 p. (In Russian)

5. Lushkin, A.M. (2015). Metodologija verojatnostnogo ocenivanija tekushhego urovnja avarijnosti po rezul'tatam faktornogo analiza aviacionnyh sobytij [Methodology of probabilistic assessment of the current level of accident rate based on factor analysis of aviation events]. Scientific Bulletin of the Moscow State Technical University of Civil Aviation, no. 218, pp. 24–28. (in Russian)

6. Guzij, A.G., Lushkin, A.M., Haustov, A.A. and Chujko, T.A. (2010). Verojatnostnyj podhod k sovokupnomu kolichestvennomu ocenivaniju urovnja bezopasnosti poletov po «piramide riskov» grazhdanskoj aviacii Rossii [Probabilistic approach to the cumulative quantitative assessment of the level of flight safety according to the "risk pyramid" of Russian civil aviation]. Problemy bezopasnosti poljotov [Flight Safety Hroblems], no. 1, pp. 12–20. (in Russian)

7. Guzij, A.G. and Haustov, A.A. (2010). Opredelenie optimal'nogo kojefficienta sglazhivanija v zadache monitoringa tekushhego urovnja bezopasnosti poletov s ispol'zovaniem metodiki prostogo i vzveshennogo skol'zjashhego srednego [Determination of the optimal smoothing coefficient in the problem of monitoring the current level of safety using the technique of simple and weighted moving average]. Problemy bezopasnosti poletov [Flight Safety Problems], no. 2, pp. 19–26. (in Russian)

8. Kofman, V.D. (2017). Sostojanie bezopasnosti poletov za 2010–2016 gg. v grazhdanskoj aviacii gosudarstv-uchastnikov Soglashenija o grazhdanskoj aviacii i ob ispol'zovanii vozdushnogo prostranstva [The state of flight safety for 2010–2016 in civil aviation of the States parties to the agreement on civil aviation and the use of airspace]. Doklad na seminare po aktual'nym voprosam bezopasnosti poletov pri ajerodromnom obespechenii poletov 9.11.2017, Moskva: Rosaviacija [Proceedings of the seminar on topical issues of flight safety in airfield flight support 2017.11.09, Moscow: The Federal Air Transport Agency]. URL: http://www.favt.ru/dejatelnost-lms-beopasnost-vpp/ (accessed 16.11.2017). (in Russian)

9. Guzij, A.G., Mishin, A.V. and Majorova, Ju.A. (2017). Kachestvo rassledovanija aviacionnyh incidentov i organizacionnye mery aviapredprijatija po ego povysheniju [Quality of investigation of aviation incidents and organizational measures of air enterprise to improve it]. Fundamental'nye i prikladnye issledovanija sovremennoj psihologii: rezul'taty i perspektivy razvitija [Fundamental and applied research of modern psychology: results and prospects]. Ed. by A.L. Zhuravlev, V.A. Koltsov. Moscow: Psychological Institute of the Russian Sciences Academy], pp. 2329–2336. (in Russian)