Aviation industry technological sovereignty optimization problem formulation
https://doi.org/10.26467/2079-0619-2025-28-1-8-19
Abstract
The aviation industry faces the difficult task of maintaining and further increasing the population air mobility at the present stage of domestic air transport and country economy development. It is fixed in the Comprehensive Program for Russian Federation Aviation Industry Development until 2030 (as amended by Decree of Russian Federation Government No. 1102-r dated May 4, 2024). There is an urgent need to develop and introduce domestic production components into aircraft type design in the context of the cessation of interaction between Russian aviation enterprises and foreign suppliers of goods and services. These actions make it possible to ensure industrial technological sovereignty and further operation of aviation equipment with the required levels of reliability and safety. The article presents a flowchart of this process developed by the authors. The flowchart considers possible types of import substitution of components. The authors performed a comparative analysis of the forecast of fleet retirement and commissioning of newly developed aviation equipment based on the available statistical data on the operation of short-haul aircraft. The need for the development of sectoral corrective measures is shown based on its results. This fact confirms the relevance of the chosen research area. The process of integration of Russian-made components into the aircraft structure is considered from the point of view of program management in the publication. The authors describe the basic principles and methods of prioritizing projects using the example of 10 components. This considers the total budget of the program, as well as its resource intensity. The optimization task is formulated in the publication based on the results of the work performed. This publication is the main one for the further development of an algorithm that will allow solving priority tasks of continued airworthiness of both the fleet in operation and newly developed aircraft.
About the Authors
I. Y. Bodrova
Moscow State Technical University of Civil Aviation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Irina Y. Bodrova, Postgraduate Student of the Aircraft and Aircraft Engines Maintenance Chair
Moscow
A. V. Gostev
Moscow Aviation Institute (National Research University)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Aleksandr V. Gostev, Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Design and Certification of Aircraft Chair
Moscow
G. D. Fainburg
Moscow State Technical University of Civil Aviation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Grigory D. Fainburg, Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Aircraft and Aircraft Engines Maintenance Chair
Moscow
References
1. Omarov, Z.G. (2022). Issues of aircraft exploitation at the present stage. Voennaya mysl’, no. 4, pp. 112–116. (in Russian)
2. Kapoguzov, E.А. (2022). Import dependency of the Russian civil aviation industry: development prospects in the light of “sanctions 2022”. Tomsk State University Journal of Economics, no. 58, pp. 58–76. DOI: 10.17223/19988648/58/4 (in Russian)
3. Romanov, M.I. (2021). Analysis of the current state of the export potential of Russian civil aircraft products. Industrial Economics, no. 3-2, pp. 89–96. DOI: 10.47576/2712-7559_2021_3_2_89 (in Russian)
4. Rampersad-Jagmohan, M., Wang, Y. (2024). Predictive Analytics in Aviation Management. In: Advanced Manufacturing and Automation XIII, vol. 1154, pp. 401–406. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-97-0665-5_52
5. Verhoeff, M., Verhagen, W.J.C. (2023). Component maintenance planning optimizationin defense aviation. Aerospace, vol. 10, issue 3, p. 255. DOI: 10.3390/aerospace10030 255/ (accessed: 16.08.2024).
6. Novikova, T.V., Blinov, A.A. (2022). Application of comparative approach methods in russian practice. Chronos Journal, vol. 6, no. 11 (73), pр. 173–176. DOI: 10.52013/2658-7556-73-11-51 (in Russian)
7. Kiselev, Y.V., Kiselev, D.Y. (2014). Current ideas about the organization interactions in technical maintenance system of aircraft equipment. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiyskoy akademii nauk, vol. 16, no. 1-5, pp. 1407–1413. (in Russian)
8. Kostin, V.N., Kalinin, A.N. (2008). Methods of optimization in examples and tasks: Tutorial. Orenburg: OGU, 153 p. (in Russian)
9. Fadeeva, N.V. (2022). Process approach to management: definitions and interpretations. Ekonomika stroitelstva, no. 11, pp. 30–37. (in Russian)
10. Baklanova, Yu.O. (2012). Evolution of the approach to project innovation management: initiative, project, program, portfolio. Sovremennyye tekhnologii upravleniya, no. 3, pp. 1–8. (in Russian)
11. Itskovich, A.A., Chernov, A.O., Fainburg, G.D., Fainburg, I.A. (2017). Increasing the aircraft airworthiness maintenance efficiency based on the project management methodology. Civil Aviation High Technologies, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 26–35. (in Russian)
12. Kul, R.H., Ates, M. (2024). A comprehensive review on the global aviation industry and aircraft maintenance management processes. Izlek Akademik Dergi, vol. 6, issue 1, pp. 20–36. DOI: 10.53804/izlek.1460088/ (accessed: 16.08.2024).
13. Kandibko, N.V. (2013). Project methods in management of defense-industrial complex innovation and investment activity. Vestnik moskovskogo universiteta im. S.Yu. Vitte. Seriya 1: ekonomika i upravleniye, no. 2 (4), pp. 52–58. (in Russian)
14. Borhan, N.H., Zulzalil, H., Hassan, S., Ali, N.M. (2022). Requirements prioritization in agile projects: from experts’ perspectives. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, vol. 100, no. 19, pp. 5710–5723.
15. Sapegina, O.A., Sumina, E.V. (2016). Projects prioritization as a basis for a strategic development of a company in a crisis. Ekonomika i sotsium, no. 10 (29), pp. 875–877. (in Russian)
16. Rudenko, M.N., Subbotina, Y.D. (2019). The organization's project management maturity assessment. Upravlencheskoye konsul’tirovaniye, no. 7, pp. 50–55. (in Russian)
17. Wagner, D.N. (2017). Learning from Aviation project resource management to avoid project failure. PM World Journal, vol. 6, issue 2, 11 p. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320839951_Learning_from_Aviation_Project_Resource_Management_to_avoid_Project_Failure (accessed: 20.08.2024).
18. Ciric, D., Delic, M., Lalic, B., Gracanin, D., Lolic, T. (2021). Exploring the link between project management approach and project success dimensions: A structural model approach. Advances in Production Engineering & Management, vol. 16, issue 1, pp. 99–111. DOI: 10.14743/apem2021.1.387/ (accessed: 16.08.2024).
19. Petrov, T.V. (2017). Network planning as a project management tool. Forum molodykh uchyenykh, no. 6 (10), pp. 1391–1397. (in Russian)
20. Bogomolov, D.V., Kharchenko, M.E. (2017). Planning the work of aviation units using project management tools. Civil Aviation High Technologies, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 88–96. (in Russian)
21. Ildarkhanova, A.K. (2018). Development of a model of financial efficiency of design and technological preproduction project portfolio on the basis of project team members employment optimization. Financial Analytics: Science and Experience, vol. 11, no. 3 (345), pp. 256–268. DOI: 10.24891/fa.11.3.256 (in Russian)
Review
For citations:
Bodrova I.Y., Gostev A.V., Fainburg G.D. Aviation industry technological sovereignty optimization problem formulation. Civil Aviation High Technologies. 2025;28(1):8-19. https://doi.org/10.26467/2079-0619-2025-28-1-8-19
Views:
197
Email this article 
