Preview

Civil Aviation High Technologies

Advanced search

Analysis of the results adequacy of the fuselage finite-element modeling in the vicinity of a large cutout

https://doi.org/10.26467/2079-0619-2023-26-4-64-76

Abstract

The issues of ensuring the reliability of the finite element models (FEM) of the fuselage in the hatch cutout zone are considered at the early aircraft design stages. The purpose and tasks of research are formulated. To assess the reliability of mathematical models, the objects with standards were selected. The methods of experimental research and measuring instruments are discussed. The results of a comparative analysis of the numerical experiment with analytical solutions and full-size experiments data are presented. For the validation of FEM structures, the checkable characteristics and types of their verification are determined. The results of this research contain a discussion of the impact of finite element mesh details on a stress concentration factor, an adequacy of modeling the stress and strain field in the vicinity of the cutout and taking into account a nonlinearity in strength calculations of structures with stress concentration. This paper focuses on the analysis of modeling a framed cylindrical shell with a large rectangular cutout, for which full-size tests were conducted by TSAGI researchers. Strains of strong frames, limiting the cutout in a cylindrical shell, shearing and equivalent stress in the skin, normal stresses in stringers at the intersection with the strong frame, displacements of strong frames cross-sections at test points are analyzed. Based on the results of this research, the recommendations for modeling thin-walled fuselage structures in the vicinity of a large cutout, ensuring the performance of calculations with engineering accuracy were formulated.    

About the Authors

A. V. Boldyrev
Samara National Research University named after S.P. Korolev (Samara University)
Russian Federation

Andrey V. Boldyrev, Doctor of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Structure and Design Aircraft Chair

Samara



M. V. Pavelchuk
Samara National Research University named after S.P. Korolev (Samara University)
Russian Federation

Maksim V. Pavelchuk, Senior Lecturer of the Structure and Design Aircraft Chair

Samara



References

1. Boldyrev, A.V., Pavelchuk, M.V., Sinelnikova, R.N. (2019). Enhancement of the fuselage structure topological optimization technique in the large cutout zone. Aerospace MAI Journal, vol. 26, no. 3, pр. 62–71. (in Russian)

2. Niu, M.C.Y. (1988). Airframe structural design. Hong Kong: Conmilit Press Ltd, 612 p.

3. Boldyrev, A.V., Komarov, V.A. (2016). The aircraft fuselage structural layout designing in the region of large cutout. AllRussian Scientific-Technical Journal “Polyot” (“Flight”), no. 8−9, pр. 21–26. (in Russian)

4. Boldyrev, A.V., Komarov, V.A., Pavelchuk, M.V. (2018). Fuselage compartment of the aircraft with a hatch cutout. Patent RU no. 2646175 C1. B64C 1/14: publ. March 1, 11 p. (in Russian)

5. Strizhius, V.E. (2012). Methods for calculating the fatigue life of aircraft structural elements. Moscow: Mashinostroeniye, 272 p. (in Russian)

6. Rychkov, S.P. (2013). Modeling of structures in Femap with NX Nastran. Moscow: DMK Press, 784 p. (in Russian)

7. Frokht, M.M. (1948). Photoelasticity: polarization-optical method of stress analysis. Translated from English by Bokstein M.F., Krasontovich Yu.F., Preuss A.K., in prof. Prigorovsky N.I. (Ed). Vol. 1. Moscow-Leningrad: Gostekhizdat, 432 p. (in Russian)

8. Savin, G.N. (1968). Stress distribution around holes. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka, 891 p. (in Russian)

9. Young, W.C., Roark, R.J., Budynas, R.G. (2002). Roark’s formulas for stress and strain. 7th ed., New York: McGraw-Hill Professional, 852 p.

10. Pogosyan, M.A., Liseytsev, N.K., Sagittarius, D.Yu. et al. (2018). Aircraft design. 5th ed., pererab i dop. Moscow: Innovatsionnoye Mashinostroyeniye, 864 p. (in Russian)

11. Zinchenko, V.I. (1998). Design and operation of the TU-154B aircraft (airframe, landing gear, systems). St. Petersburg: Akademiya GA, 89 p. (in Russian)

12. Khlebutin, N.V. (1961). Experimental research of stresses and strains under torsion a framed cylindrical shell with a rectangular cutout. Trudy TsAGI, issue 816, 67 р. (in Russian)

13. Kasatkin, B.S. Kudrin, A.B., Lobanov, L.M., Pivtorak, V.A., Polukhin, P.I., Chichenev, N.A. (1981). Experimental methods of deformation and stress analysis. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka, 584 p. (in Russian)

14. Alexandrov, A.Ya., Akhmetzyanov, M.Kh. (1973). Polarization-optical methods of deformable body mechanics. Moscow: Nauka, 576 p. (in Russian)

15. Peresypkin, V.P. (1979). Some applied aspects of the finite element method in aircraft structures calculations: Cand. of Tech. Sc. Thesis. Kuibyshev: KuAI, 209 p. (in Russian)

16. Astakhov, M.F., Karavaev, A.V., Makarov, S.Ya., Suzdaltsev, Ya.Ya. (1954). Reference book for an aircraft strength calculation. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoye izdatelstvo oboronnoy promyshlennosti, 701 p. (in Russian)

17. Fomin, V.P. (1980). Calculation of cylindrical reinforced shells considering the nonlinear behavior of structure elements. Uchenyye zapiski TsAGI, vol. 11, no. 1, pр. 72–80. (in Russian)

18. Perelmuter, A.V., Tur, V.V. (2017). Whether we are ready to proceed to a nonlinear analysis at designing? International Journal for Computational Civil and Structural Engineering, vol. 13, no. 3, pр. 86−102. (in Russian)

19. Rudakov, K.N. (2011). Femap 10.2.0. Geometric and finite element modeling of structures. Kyiv: NTUU “KPI”, 317 p. (in Russian)


Review

For citations:


Boldyrev A.V., Pavelchuk M.V. Analysis of the results adequacy of the fuselage finite-element modeling in the vicinity of a large cutout. Civil Aviation High Technologies. 2023;26(4):64-76. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26467/2079-0619-2023-26-4-64-76

Views: 285


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2079-0619 (Print)
ISSN 2542-0119 (Online)