Sensitivity analysis of the nonparametric criterion of aircraft flght control system sensors failures detection and isolation
https://doi.org/10.26467/2079-0619-2021-24-5-32-48
Abstract
Failures of the aircraft control system sensors can cause both deterioration of stability and controllability characteristics and the inability of safe automatic control. It is necessary to detect and isolate such failures to determine the time and place of their occurrence in order to disable failed sensors or to diagnose them subsequently for reconfiguration during the flight. The direct use of traditional parametric approaches for sensors health monitoring by using their mathematical models is impossible due to the lack of data about the true information input signals received by their sensitive elements. This leads to the necessity of solving the problem of modeling the aircraft flight dynamics with a high level of uncertainties, which makes it difficult to utilize the functional control methods and necessitate the use of excessive sensor hardware redundancy. Well-known nonparametric methods either require a priori knowledge base, preliminary training or long-term tuning on a large volume of real flight data or have low selective sensitivity for reliable detection of failed sensors. In this work, the original nonparametric criterion for detecting and isolating sensors failures is derived. Its sensitivity is analyzed by using a complete nonlinear mathematical model of aircraft flight dynamics with a regular flight control system. The theoretical value and the criterion sensitivity coefficients are determined. The formula for the automatic evaluation of the float criterion threshold value is given. A high convergence of the results with theoretical ones is shown. This makes it possible to use the obtained criterion not only for the instant detection and isolation of sensors failures, but also for preliminary diagnostics of their quantitative characteristics.
About the Authors
J. V. BondarenkoRussian Federation
Julia V. Bondarenko, Post-Graduate Student
Moscow
E. Yu. Zybin
Russian Federation
Eugene Yu. Zybin, Doctor of Technical Sciences, Head of Laboratory
Moscow
References
1. Kosyanchuk, V., Selvesyuk, N. and Kulchak, A. (2015). Aircraft control law reconfiguration. Aviation, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 14–18. DOI: 10.3846/16487788.2015.1015290
2. Reppa, V., Polycarpou, M.M. and Panayiotou, C.G. (2016). Sensor fault diagnosis. Foundations and Trends in Systems and Control, vol. 3, no. 1-2, p. 1–248, DOI: 10.1561/2600000007
3. Lopes, P.V.P., Hsu, L., Vilzmann, M. and Kondak, K. (2019). Model-based sensor fault detection in an autonomous solar-powered aircraft. FT2019. Proceedings of the 10th Aerospace Technology Congress, no. 162, p. 247–254. DOI: 10.3384/ecp19162029
4. Prabhu, S. and Anitha, G. (2020). An innovative analytic redundancy approach to air data sensor fault detection. The Aeronautical Journal, vol. 124, no. 1273, p. 346–367. DOI: 10.1017/aer.2019.143
5. Fravolini, M.L., Napolitano, M.R., Del Core, G. and Papa, U. (2018). Experimental interval models for the robust fault detection of aircraft air data sensors. Control Engineering Practice, vol. 78, p. 196–212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2018.07.002
6. Kos'yanchuk, V.V. (2004). Checking and diagnostics of subsystems in a closed control loop. Journal of Computer and Systems Sciences International, vol. 43, no. 1, p. 62–71.
7. Tidriri, K., Chatti, N., Verron, S. and Tiplica, T. (2016). Bridging data-driven and model-based approaches for process fault diagnosis and health monitoring: A review of researches and future challenges. Annual Reviews in Control, vol. 42, p. 63–81. DOI: 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2016.09.008
8. Fravolini, M.L., Del Core, G., Papa, U., Valigi, P. and Napolitano, M.R. (2017). Datadriven schemes for robust fault detection of air data system sensors. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 27, no. 1, p. 234–248. DOI: 10.1109/TCST.2017.2758345
9. Wang, K., Chen, J. and Song, Z. (2017). Data-driven sensor fault diagnosis systems for linear feedback control loops. Journal of Process Control, vol. 54, p. 152–171. DOI: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2017.03.001
10. Cartocci, N., Napolitano, M.R., Costante, G. and Fravolini, M.L. (2021). A comprehensive case study of data-driven methods for robust aircraft sensor fault isolation. Sensors, vol. 21, no. 5, p. 1645. DOI: 10.3390/s21051645
11. Gao, T., Sheng, W., Zhou, M., Fang, B. and Zheng, L. (2020). MEMS inertial sensor fault diagnosis using a cnn-based data-driven method. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 34, no. 14, p. 2059048. DOI:10.1142/s021800142059048x
12. Sheriff, M.Z., Botre, Ch., Mansouri, M., Nounou, H., Nounou, M. and Karim, M.N. (2017). Process monitoring using data-based fault detection techniques: Comparative studies. In book: Fault Diagnosis and Detection, chapter 10, p. 237–261. DOI: 10.5772/67347
13. Swischuk, R. and Allaire, D. (2019). A machine learning approach to aircraft sensor error detection and correction. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, vol. 19, no. 4, ID: 041009, 12 p. DOI: 10.1115/1.4043567
14. Xu, S. (2019). A survey of knowledge-based intelligent fault diagnosis techniques. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing, vol. 1187, no. 3, ID: 032006. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1187/3/032006 (accessed: 12.04.2021).
15. Balzano, F., Fravolini, M.L., Napolitano, M.R., D’Urso, S., Crispoltoni, M. and Del Core, G. (2018). Air data sensor fault detection with an augmented floating limiter. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, vol. 2018, article ID: 1072056, 16 p. DOI: 10.1155/2018/1072056
16. Bondarenko, Ju.V. and Zybin, E.Yu. (2020). Functional control of the technical condition method for aircraft control system sensors under complete parametric uncertainty. Civil Aviation High Technologies, vol. 23, no. 3, p. 39–51. DOI: 10.26467/2079-0619-2020-23-3-39-51
17. Bondarenko, Yu.V., Chekin, A.Yu., Zybin, E.Yu. and Kosyanchuk, V.V. (2020). Nonparametric method for aircraft sensor fault real-time detection and localization. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 714, ID: 012004, 6 p. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/714/1/012004
18. Zybin, E.Yu., Misrikhanov, M.Sh. and Ryabchenko, V.N. (2004). O minimalnoy parametrizatsii resheniy lineynykh matrichnykh uravneniy [On minimal parameterization of solutions to linear matrix equations]. Vestnik IGEU, no. 6, p. 127–131. (in Russian)
Review
For citations:
Bondarenko J.V., Zybin E.Yu. Sensitivity analysis of the nonparametric criterion of aircraft flght control system sensors failures detection and isolation. Civil Aviation High Technologies. 2021;24(5):32-48. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26467/2079-0619-2021-24-5-32-48