Study of running engines inertial and gyroscopic properties influence on the dynamic system engine – pylon – wing structural capabilities
https://doi.org/10.26467/2079-0619-2020-23-3-63-72
Abstract
A modern large-sized aircraft dynamic properties analysis, determined by the specificity of its layout scheme, demonstrates that the engines on under the wing elastic pylons lightly damped oscillations cause a number of undesirable phenomena, including intense accumulation of fatigue damage of the pylon-to-the-wing attachment, in fact in the area of engine installation in the pylon and the wing. The results of theoretical and experimental research show that with some engine attachment to the pylon structural modification it becomes possible to use the engines inertial and gyroscopic properties to absorb these oscillations. In this case, the motor tones damping coefficients increase by an order of magnitude or even more, so the gyroscopic coupling of elastic vibration tones is realized. With the rational choice of the additional parameters of elastic and dissipative bonds in the engine attachments it is possible to affect the aircraft wing and engines aero elastic vibrations effectively, which has a significant effect on the aircraft elements structural capabilities. A mathematical model of aero elasticity (MMAE) with respect to the kinetic moment of the engine rotors and specially designed units for attaching the engines to the pylons was developed in order to study the influence and the selection of rational elastic-dissipative parameters of the pylons-under-the-wing aircraft engine mounts. The method of predetermined basic forms is used for the aircraft with running engines on the pylons MMAE synthesis. The given forms are considered as the aircraft basic structure forms natural vibrations in the void. This work treats the engine nacelle and the rotor as absolutely rigid bodies, the elasticity of the rotor to the nacelle attachment is neglected. The pylon is modeled by an elastic beam, and the elastic and dissipative properties of the pylon-to-the-wing and the engine-to-the-pylon attachments are correspondingly by elastic-dissipative bonds. Schematic diagrams of the engine to the pylon attachments are proposed. The results of the study devoted to the influence of the proposed attachment points modifications on the load and integral strength characteristics of the main structural elements of the engine – pylon – wing dynamic system on the example of an An-124 aircraft are presented. The practical implementation of the proposed solutions aimed to reduce the level of fatigue damage to structural elements of the aircraft feasibility is proved.
About the Authors
V. V. OvchinnikovRussian Federation
Valery V. Ovchinnikov, Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, the Head of Physics Fundamentals ChairMoscow
Yu. V. Petrov
Russian Federation
Yuriy V. Petrov, Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, the Head of Technical Mechanics and Engineering Graphics Chair
Moscow
References
1. Ovchinnikov, V.V. and Petrov, Iu.V. (2017). Chislennyye metody issledovaniya aerouprugosti letatelnykh apparatov: Monografiya [Numerical methods for the study of aircraft aeroelasticity: a monography]. Moscow: Izdatelskiy dom Academii imeni N.E. Zhukovskogo, 160 p. (in Russia)
2. Fujino, M., Oyama, H. and Omotani, H. (2003). Flutter characteristics of an over-thewing engine mount business-jet configuration. 44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference. AIAA 2003-1942, pp. 1–12. DOI: 10.2514/6.2003-1942
3. Waitz, S. and Hennings, H. (2015). The aeroelastic impact of engine thrust and gyroscopics on aircraft flutter instabilities. International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, IFASD-2015, pp. 1–15.
4. Skelly, J. and Laporte, A. (2011). Engine pylon for aircraft. Patent US, no. US20110204179A1, August 25, 2011, 7 рр.
5. Wang, L., Wan, Z., Wu, Q. and Yang, Ch. (2012). Aeroelastic modeling and analysis of the wing/engine system of a large aircraft. Procedia Engineering, vol. 31, pp. 779–885. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.1116
6. Liu, D., Wan, Z., Yang, Ch. and Yang, T. (2010). Primary modeling and analysis of wing based on aeroelastic optimization. AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference. AIAA 2010-2719, 15 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2010-2719
7. Barys, M. and Zalewski, R. (2018). Analysis of inertial amplification mechanism with smart spring-damper for attenuation of beam vibrations. MATEC Web of Conferences: Machine Modelling and Simulations, vol. 157, 03002, 9 pp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815703002
8. Kumar, G., Walter, E. and Jack, S. (1991). Vibration damping aircraft engine attachment. Patent US, no. US5065959A, November 19, 1991, 8 p.
9. Haber, O. (2006). Vibration damping pylon. Patent US, no. US20060060713A1, March 23, 2006, 9 p.
10. Frolov, K.V. (Ed.). (1981). Vibratsiya v tekhnike: spravochnik v 6-ti tomakh [Vibration in technology: guide in 6 volumes]. Tom 6 Zashchita ot vibratsii i udarov [Vibration and shock protection, vol 6]. Moscow: Mashinostroyeniye, 456 p. (in Russian)
11. Serov, M.V., Averyanov, G.M. and Alexandrova, S.G. (2013). Experience of using vibration theory to practical issues of application of inertial dynamic vibration absorbers. Scientific journal "Izvestiya MGTU "MAMI", vol. 3, no. 1 (15), pp. 118–124. (in Russian)
12. He, H., Xie, X. and Wang, W. (2017). Vibration control of tower structure with multiple cardan gyroscope. Shock and Vibration, vol. 2017, article ID 3548360, 11 pp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3548360
13. Nashif, A.D., Jones, D.I.G. and Henderson, J.P. (1985). Vibration Damping. John Wiley & Sons, 480 p.
14. De Silva, C.W. (2007). Vibration damping, control, and design. 1st ed., CRC Press, 634 p.
15. Ünker, F. and Çuvalci, O. (2015). Vibration control of a column using a gyroscope. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 195, 3 July, pp. 2306–2315. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.182
16. William, P.R. (2011). Theoretical and computational aeroelasticity. 1st ed., Crest Publishing, 347 p.
17. Chernyshev, S.L., Zichenkov, M.Ch., Ishmuratov, F.Z. and Chedrik, V.V. (2017). Tendencies in development of computational mechanics for strength design of aircraft structures. Chebyshevskii Sbornik, vol. 18, no. 3 (63), pp. 488–505. DOI: 10.22405/2226-8383-2017-18-3-488-505
18. Parafes, S.G. and Smyslov, V.I. (2018). Proektirovaniye konstruktsii i SAU BPLA s uchetom aerouprugosti. Postanovka i metody resheniya zadach [Design of the structure and selfpropelled guns of UAVs taking into account aeroelasticity. Statement and methods of solving the problem]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo Tekhnosfera, 182 p. (in Russia)
19. Garifullin, M.F. (2016). Chislitelnyye metody v raschetnykh i eksperimentalnykh issledovaniyakh nestatsionarnykh yavleniy aerouprugosti. Kniga 1: Chislennyye metody v raschetnykh issledovaniyakh [Numerical methods in the calculation and experimental studies of unsteady phenomena of aeroelasticity. Book 1. Numerical methods in computational research] Moscow: Nauka, 350 p. (in Russian)
20. Wright, J.R. and Cooper, J.E. (2015). Introduction to Aircraft Aeroelasticity and Loads. 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, 574 p.
Review
For citations:
Ovchinnikov V.V., Petrov Yu.V. Study of running engines inertial and gyroscopic properties influence on the dynamic system engine – pylon – wing structural capabilities. Civil Aviation High Technologies. 2020;23(3):63-72. https://doi.org/10.26467/2079-0619-2020-23-3-63-72