Formation of private performance criteria A-CDM taking into account the interests of the participants in the decision-making process in a dynamic environment

The article describes the process of collaborative management at airports A-CDM in dynamically changing conditions of the productive process, defined as the occurrence of emergency situations capable of altering the planned actions. In real operation, in this case, a large number of possible solutions for each emergency situation appears, the lower the level of recording for these options, the more their number. This paper focuses on external factors that significantly affect the activities of airlines and airports and to the relevant management retaliation formalized in the form of five points.  The relevance of the choice is dictated by the presence of conflicting interests of stakeholders. Objective explanation in favor of a decision based on the minimization of the total losses from the outbreak of emergencies would significantly strengthen the position of each participant in the process. The authors have introduced a number of mathematical notations and assumptions, a list of which can be supplemented. Dynamic priorities for each participant in the process are formulated. The tool for optimization of joint decision-making is the genetic algorithm, which allows for a smaller number of iterations in the real time to get suboptimal decision that meets the requirements of the participants in the process. As an example, the article describes a situation that may occur in a real-world production. Based on the multiplicative form a dynamic priority for delayed flights is assigned, taking into account the conflicting interests of the participants in the process, private ranking criteria for flights during each step of the rescheduling are formed, a genetic algorithm is applied. As a result, a specific decision of the emergency situation, arising spontaneously from the impact of external factors is obtained. This mathematical apparatus has prospects of introduction into the productive process as any emergency can be built into the solving algorithm and taken into account.

collaborative decision making (CDM), flight safety, genetic algorithm, priority services

1. Borsoyev, V.A., Lebedev, G.N., Malygin, V.B., Nechayev, Ye.Ye., Nikulin, A.O. and Tin Pkhon Chzho. (2018). Prinyatie resheniya v zadachakh upravleniya vozdushnym dvizheniyem. Metody i algoritmy [Decision making in air traffic management tasks. Methods and algorithms], in Nechaev Ye.Ye. (Ed.). Moscow: Radiotekhnika, рp. 351–415. (in Russian)

2. Nikulin, A.O. (2018). The system of collaborative decision making as an effective tool for the organization of the airport operation in peak loads. Civil Aviation High Technologies, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 43–55. DOI: 10.26467/2079-0619-2018-21-5-43-55. (in Russian)

3. Nikulin, A.O. and Popov, A.A. (2015). Implementation procedures A-CDM at the airport Sheremetyevo. Nauchnyi Vestnic MGTU GA [Civil Aviation High Technologies], no. 221, pp. 68–80. (in Russian)

4. Nechaev, E.E. and Nikulin, A.O. (2018). The Analytical treatment of the system "SYNCHRON" at Sheremetyevo airport in adverse weather conditions. Civil Aviation High Technologies, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 31–42. DOI: 10.26467/2079-0619-2018-21-6-31-42. (in Russian)

5. Zhiltsov, I.E., Mitrofanov, A.K. and Rudelson, L.E. (2018). Air space capacity assessment regarding the problem of the collaborative management of air traffic flows. Civil Aviation High Technologies, vol. 21, no. 2, pр. 83–95. DOI: 10.26467/2079-0619-2018-21-2-83-95. (in Russian)

6. Lugovaya, A.V. and Konovalov, A.E. (2017). Collaborative decision-making on the inbound and outbound air traffic flow in air traffic management. Civil Aviation High Technologies, vol. 20, no. 4, рp. 78–87. DOI: 10.26467/2079-0619-2017-20-4-78-87. (in Russian)

7. Sobol, E.M. and Statnikov, R.B. (1981). Vybor optimalnykh parametrov v zadachakh so mnogimi kriteriyami [Selection of optimal parameters in tasks with many criteria]. Moscow: Nauka, 110 р. (in Russian)

8. Rudelson L.E. (2008). Programmnoe obespechenie avtomatizirovannykh system upravleniya vozdushnym dvizheniem. Chast I. Sistemnoe programmnoe obespechenie. Kniga 2, Operatsyonnye sistemy realnogo vremeni. Matematicheskie modeli [Software for automated air traffic control systems. Part I. System software. B2. Real-time operating systems. Mathematical models]. Uchebnoe posobie [Training manual]. Moscow: MGTU GA, 96 p. (in Russian)

9. Zaitsev, A.V. and Talimanchuk, L.L. (2008). Intellektualnaya sistema prinyatiya resheniy dlya otsenki nauchnoy deyatelnosti na osnove mnogoagentnoy sistemy [Intellectual decisionmaking system for the evaluation of scientific activity based on a multi-agent system]. Journal Neurocomputers, no. 7, pp. 85-88. (in Russian)

10. Gabeydulin, R.Kh. (2018). The Dynamic Air Traffic Flow Management by Assigning Ground Flight Delays. Trudy GosNII AS.[Proceedings of State Scientific Research Institute of Aviation Systems] Seriya: Voprosy avioniki [Series: Avionics Issues], no. 2, pр. 39–53. (in Russian)