Comparative analysis of quality indicators of aviation kerosine, biofuels and their mixtures
https://doi.org/10.26467/2079-0619-2019-22-5-67-75
Abstract
Modern trends of civil aviation development indicate the need to improve fuel efficiency and environmental friendliness of the utilized fuels. The use of conventional jet fuel is meeting to a lesser degree the promising requirements concerning environmental friendliness at a constantly rising price for it. Apart from that, oil reserves are limited. According to many experts, the solution to the growing problems with oil fuels can be application of alternative types of aviation fuel. A number of companies around the world, together with aircraft manufacturers under the significant state support, are actively developing new types of fuel. At the moment the most widespread biofuels consisting of bioethanol are obtained from various plant and animal sources. Alternative fuels should not be inferior to petroleum fuels in its operational properties. A possible transition to them should not require significant costs for the modernization of aircraft and facilities of ground aviation fuel supply. Therefore, an urgent task is to compare the main indicators of the quality of oil fuels, biofuels and their mixtures to assess the possibility of using biofuels on aircraft. A comparative analysis was carried out on some quality indicators. Afterwards the comments were given on the impact of changes of these quality indicators on the performance properties of the fuels. It is shown that according to some quality indicators, biofuels under research have the advantages over oil ones. The relevance of comprehensive study of the performance properties of biofuels is obvious. The improvement of oil fuels and their comprehensive study have been under way for more than 60 years. Biofuels are just beginning their life, so it is reasonable to conduct thorough research on their use in aviation.
About the Authors
K. I. GryadunovRussian Federation
Konstantin I. Gryadunov, Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Chair of Aviation Fuel Supply and Aircraft Repair
Moscow
A. N. Kozlov
Russian Federation
Alexander N. Kozlov, Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Chair of Aviation Fuel Supply and Aircraft Repair
Moscow
V. M. Samoylenko
Russian Federation
Vasiliy M. Samoylenko, Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Chair of Aviation Fuel Supply and Aircraft Repair
Moscow
S. Ardeshiri
Canada
Ardeshiri Shadi, Junior Research Fellow
Vancouver
References
1. Litvinov, A.A. (1987). Osnovy primeneniya goryuche-smazochnykh materialov v grazhdanskoy aviatsii [Bases of fuel and lubricants application in civil aviation]. Moscow: Transport, 308 p. (in Russian)
2. Bratkov, A.A. and Seregin, E.P. (1987). Khimmotologiya raketnykh i reaktivnykh topliv [Chemmotology of rocket and jet fuel]. Moscow: Khimiya, 304 p. (in Russian)
3. Gishvarov, A.S. (2008). Ekspluatatsionnaya nadezhnost toplivnykh sistem vozdushnykh sudov: Uchebnoe posobie [Operational reliability of aircraft fuel systems: Training manual]. Ufa: UGATU. 298 p. (in Russian)
4. Konyaev, E.A. and Gryadunov, K.I. (2016). Ekspluatatsionnyye svoystva aviatsionnykh goryuche-smazochnykh materialov: Uchebnoe posobie [Operational properties of aviation fuel and lubricant: Training manual]. Moscow: MGTU GA, 80 p. (in Russian)
5. Nurgaleev, A. (2012). Biotoplivo nuzhdaetsya v gosudarstvennoy podderzhke [Biofuel needs state support]. Available at: https://www.aviaport.ru/news/2012/02/01/228946.html (accessed: 15.03.2019). (in Russian)
6. Nikolaykin, N.I., Melnikov, B.N. and Bolshunov, Yu.A. (2010). Transfer into alternative kinds of fuel as the way of transport power and ecological efficiency increase. The Scientific Bulletin of the Moscow State Technical University of Civil Aviation, no. 162, pp. 12–21. (in Russian)
7. Fedchenko, I.A., Solovtsova, A.S. and Lukyanov, A.N. (2013). Analiticheskiy otchet. Osnovnyye tendentsii razvitiya rynka biotopliva v mire i Rossii za 2000–2012 gody [Analytical report. The main trends in the development of the biofuel market in the world and in Russia in 2000–2012]. Available at: http://portal-energo.ru/files/articles/portal-energo_ru_2.pdf (accessed: 25.03.2019). (in Russian)
8. Glover, B.M. (2008). Boeing and the Environment: Our Commitment to a Better Future. Presentation of Boeing Management Company. Seattle (USA): Boeing Management Company, 17.06.2008.
9. Lefebvre A.H., Ballal D.R. (2017). Gas Turbine Combustion Alternative Fuels and Emissions. International Renewable Energy Agency. Available at: https://www.irena.org/DocumentDownloads/Publications/IRENA_Biofuels_for_Aviation_2017.pdf (accessed: 15.06.2019).
10. Vasilyev, A.Yu., Chelebyan, O.G. and Medvedev, R.S. (2013). Peculiarities of application of biofuel mixture in combustion chambers of modern gas turbine engines. Vestnik of Samara University. Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, no. 3 (41), part 2, pp. 57–62.
11. Gryadunov, K.I. and Maslova, T.M. (2019). Himmotologiya i kontrol kachestva GSM. Aviatsionnyye topliva [Chemmotology and quality control of fuel and lubricants. Aviation fuel]. Teaching aid. Moscow: OOO «MIR», 56 p. (in Russian)
Review
For citations:
Gryadunov K.I., Kozlov A.N., Samoylenko V.M., Ardeshiri S. Comparative analysis of quality indicators of aviation kerosine, biofuels and their mixtures. Civil Aviation High Technologies. 2019;22(5):67-75. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26467/2079-0619-2019-22-5-67-75