Maneuverable unmanned aerial vehicle "rudder - drive” system design for aeroelastic stability
https://doi.org/10.26467/2079-0619-2019-22-4-54-66
Abstract
The article considers the technique of designing a "rudder - drive" system aimed at ensuring safety from flutter of the flight control that is the aerodynamic rudder and the "rudder-drive" system stability. The rudder flutter represents a dynamic form of aeroelastic stability loss; the potential possibility of oscillation onset in the "rudder - drive" system is associated with the aeroelastic interaction of the control surface and drive in flight. The implementation of these requirements when designing a maneuverable unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) is an important condition for the UAV creation that is safe from aeroelastic phenomena. An important stage of designing the aeroelastic "rudder - drive" system is the coordinated choice of the subsystems parameters: a rudder and a drive meeting the requirement of the designed system stability. To solve this problem, an iterative method based on the use of the linearized or nonlinear models of the "rudder-drive" system stability research developed by the authors is proposed. According to this method, the problem solution of the rudder - drive subsystems parameters coordination supposes several stages. Initially the analysis of the "rudder - drive" system stability is carried out. In case of its instability (or lack of necessary stability reserves), the effective measures to ensure the designed system stability are developed. Depending on the selected measures the new tasks of designing the rudder-drive subsystems where the limits imposed by the requirement of the system stability are additionally taken into account. Presenting the methodology basics of designing the aeroelastic "rudder-drive" system is accompanied by the example of coordination of the aerodynamic rudder, the electrical and mechanical type drive parameters in which stability of the aeroelastic system is provided by means of the correction of the rudder design characteristics.
About the Authors
V. N. AkimovRussian Federation
Vladimir N. Akimov - Doctor of Technical Sciences, Deputy General Director for Science -Chief Designer
D. N. Ivanov
Russian Federation
Dmitry N. Ivanov - Head of the Testing Center, Dolgoprudny RPE, Postgraduate Student of the Design and Strength of Aircraft, Rocket and Space Products Chair, MAI
A. Yu. Nagornov
Russian Federation
Andrey Yu. Nagornov - Postgraduate Student of the Design and Strength of Aircraft, Rocket and Space Products Chair
S. G. Parafes
Russian Federation
Sergey G. Parafes’, Doctor of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Professor of the Design and Strength of Aircraft, Rocket and Space Products Chair
References
1. Gupta, K.K. and Bach, C. (2007). Systems identification approach for a computational-fluid-dynamics-based aeroelastic analysis. AIAA Journal, vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 2820-2827.
2. Balas, G.J., Moreno, C. and Seiler, P.J. (2012). Robust aeroservoelastic control utilizing physics-based aerodynamic sensing. AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, 13-16 August 2012, Minneapolis, Minnesota. AIAA 2012-4897.
3. Haghighat, S., Martins, J.R.RA. and Liu, H.H.T. (2012). Aeroservoelastic design optimization of a flexible wing. Journal of Aircraft, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 432-443.
4. Luber, W. (2012). Aeroservoelastic flight control design for a military combat aircraft weapon system. 28th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences (ICAS), 23-28 September, 2012, Brisbane, Australia.
5. Nalci, M.O. and Kayran, A. (2014). Aeroservoelastic modeling and analysis of a missile control surface with a nonlinear electromechanical actuator. AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, AIAA AVIATION Forum, 16-20 June 2014, Atlanta, Georgia. AIAA 2014-2055. DOI:10.2514/6.2014-2055
6. Stanford, B. (2018). Aeroservoelastic optimization under stochastic gust constraints. Applied Aerodynamics Conference, AIAA AVIATION Forum, 25-29 June 2018, Hyatt Regency, Atlanta, Georgia. AIAA 2018-2837. DOI:10.2514/6.2018-2837
7. Parafes', S.G. (2009). Metody strukturno-parametricheskoy optimizatsii konstruktsii bespi-lotnykh letatelnykh apparatov [Methods of structural and parametric optimization of unmanned aerial vehicles design]. Moscow: Izd-vo MAI-PRINT, 316 p. (in Russian)
8. Parafes', S.G. and Smyslov, V.I. (2018). Proyektirovaniye konstruktsii i SAU BPLA s uchetom aerouprugosti: postanovka i metody resheniya zadachi [Design of the construction and ACS of UAV taking into account aeroelasticity: formulation and methods of solving the problem]. Moscow: Tekhnosfera, 181 p. (in Russian)
9. Gerashchenko, A.N., Postnikov, V.A. and Samsonovich, S.L. (2010). Pnevmaticheskiye, gidravlicheskiye i elektricheskiye privody letatelnykh apparatov na osnove volnovykh ispolnitelnykh mekhanizmov [Pneumatic, hydraulic and electric drives of aerial vehicles based on wave actuators]. Moscow: Izd-vo MAI, 548 p. (in Russian)
10. Polkovnikov, V.A. (2015). Predelnyye dinamicheskiye vozmozhnosti sledyashchikh privodov letatelnykh apparatov. Osnovnyye teorii. Analiz i sintez [Limit dynamic capabilities of servo drives of aerial vehicles. The basic theories. The analysis and synthesis]. Uchebnoye posobiye [Training manual]. Moscow: Izd-vo MAI, 318 p. (in Russian)
Review
For citations:
Akimov V.N., Ivanov D.N., Nagornov A.Yu., Parafes S.G. Maneuverable unmanned aerial vehicle "rudder - drive” system design for aeroelastic stability. Civil Aviation High Technologies. 2019;22(4):54-66. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26467/2079-0619-2019-22-4-54-66