Preview

Civil Aviation High Technologies

Advanced search

ABOUT THE TRANSITION TO QNH PRESSURE IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

https://doi.org/10.26467/2079-0619-2018-21-6-8-19

Abstract

This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of transition to QNH pressure. The analysis of various factors affecting the flight safety has been conducted. A comparative analysis of the two types of altitude reading while approaching the airport has been carried out. The first type is the altitude reading relative to the airfield when at an aerodrome surface an altimeter altitude is equal to zero. This pressure is called QFE. The second one is estimated relatively to the sea level; in this case the aerodrome elevation must be taken into account. Such pressure is called QNH. These both pressures are used in aviation. Historically, QFE pressure was used in the USSR, and after the disintegration of the Soviet Union this type of pressure was used during takeoff and landing. In the mid - 2000s, the majority of Russian airlines began to use the foreign aircraft, mainly the airplanes produced by Boeing and Airbus Companies. Since these aircraft are produced in Western countries, they use QNH pressure, so there are some difficulties of correct altitude setting while approaching an aerodrome, this causes an aircraft descent below the level prescribed by STAR, consequently, decent below minimum safe altitude. The conclusion of necessary transition to QNH pressure was made using the example of aircraft. The article also explains why the transition to QNH pressure flights in the Russian Federation is a top priority and a necessary step for maintaining proper level of flight safety.

About the Authors

N. A. Assorov
Federal State Unitary Enterprise “State ATM Corporation”
Russian Federation
Nikita A. Assorov, Air Traffic Controller at Moscow Centre of Air Traffic Management Automation


E. E. Nechaev
Moscow State Technical University of Civil Aviation
Russian Federation
Evgeniy E. Nechaev, Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Air Traffic Management Chair, Moscow State Technical University of Civil Aviation


P. S. Surint
Federal State Unitary Enterprise “State ATM Corporation”
Russian Federation
Pavel S. Surint, Air Traffic Controller at Moscow Centre of Air Traffic Management Automation


References

1. Zatonskiy, V.M. and Sannikov, V.А. (2001). Tekhnologiya upravleniya vozdushnym dvizheniem pri vozniknovenii potentsialno-konfliktnykh situatsiy [The technology of air traffic control in the case of potential-conflict situations]. Uchebnoe posobie [Tutorial]. St. Petersburg: SPSU CА. (in Russian)

2. Malygin, V.B. and Nechaev, E.E. (2011). Obespechenie bezopasnosti poletov pri upravlenii vozdushnym dvizheniem [Accidents prevention during air traffic control]. Uchebnoe posobie [Tutorial]. Moscow: MSTUCА. (in Russian)

3. Rudelson, L.E. (2007). Programmnoe obespechenie АS UVD [Software of ATC AS]. Uchebnoe posobie. Tutorial. Moscow: MSTUCА. (in Russian)

4. Zatonskiy, V.M., Kazakov, V.А. and Knyazevskiy, D.A. (2001). Obsluzhivanie vozdushnogo dvizheniya na mezhdunarodnykh vozdushnykh liniyakh [Air traffic service of international airlines]. Ulyanovsk: UVAU GA, 2001. 190 p. (in Russian)

5. Assorov, N.A., Nechaev, E.E. and Chekhov, I.A. (2016). K voprosu o vysote perekhoda v vozdushnom prostranstve Rossiyskoy Federatsii [About transition altitude in the Russian Federation air space]. The Scientific Bulletin of the Moscow State Technical University of Civil Aviation, no. 226, pp. 5–11. DOI:10.26467/2079-0619-2016-0-226-5-11 (in Russian)

6. Pyatko, S.G. (2017). Povyshenie effektivnosti upravleniya vozdushnim dvizheniem v Moskovskoy zone ES OrVD [Improving the efficiency of air traffic management in Moscow zone of Joint ATM system]. Aviation explorer. URL: https://www.aex.ru/docs/4/2017/12/22/2701 (accessed 12.22.2017). (in Russian)

7. Assorov, N.A. (2015). Analiz organizatsii vozdushnogo dvizheniya v nekotorykh krupnykh aeroportakh mira [Analysis of air traffic management in some major airports of the world]. The Scientific Bulletin of the Moscow State Technical University of Civil Aviation, no. 221, pp. 5–12. DOI: 10.26467/2079-0619-2015--221-5-12 (in Russian)

8. Malygin, V.B. and Nechaev, E.E. (2014). Metod snizheniya konfliktnosti na standartnykh marshrutakh vyleta i pribytiya [The method of lowering conflict situations of standard departure and arrival routes]. The Scientific Bulletin of the Moscow State Technical University of Civil Aviation, no. 209, pp. 117–123. (in Russian)

9. Mikhaylov, N.А. (2000). Mezhdunarodnye polety [International flights]. Uchebnoe posobie [Tutorial]. St. Petersburg. (in Russian)

10. Lipin, A.V. and Popov, K.S. (2005). Vypolnenie mezhdunarodnykh poletov. Obsluzhivanie vozdushnogo dvizheniya [International flight operation. Air traffic service]. Vol. 4. 2nd ed. St. Petersburg: SPSU CA; Automated training center. (in Russian)


Review

For citations:


Assorov N.A., Nechaev E.E., Surint P.S. ABOUT THE TRANSITION TO QNH PRESSURE IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. Civil Aviation High Technologies. 2018;21(6):8-19. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26467/2079-0619-2018-21-6-8-19

Views: 1930


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2079-0619 (Print)
ISSN 2542-0119 (Online)