PROJECTS ON AIRPORTS, AIRFIELDS, HELICOPTER AERODROMES AND LANDING GROUNDS SANITARY PROTECTION AREAS AS THE BASIS OF THEIR ACTIVITY COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT TO ECOLOGICAL REQUIREMENTS
https://doi.org/10.26467/2079-0619-2017-20-4-146-155
Abstract
Ten years experience of the development of domestic airports sanitary protection zones projects in civil aviation based on Sanitary Regulations and Norms 2.2.1/2.1.1.1200-03 requirements is analyzed, the reasons of loss of quality of project works and delaying of coordination terms at the last stage of the development are established. It is shown that among the main reasons for current negative situation with projects development and coordination are: absence of a check algorithm of settlement borders of areas and contours of aviation noise with the use of natural researches methods in Sanitary Regulations and Norms 2.2.1/2.1.1.1200-03; absence of methods of amendment in projects and regulations of establishment of the airport sanitary protection zones final dimensions. Examples of oversized and undersized noise areas and ones of the polluting substances dispersion as well as the reasons of local authorities’ interests in it are given.
Conceptional strategies which should be used in the edition of a new Russian conservancy normative document regulating the development of projects on sanitary protection areas. New document will allow to consider various factors of negative environmental impact of the airports, airfields, helicopter aerodromes and landing grounds activities.
It is offered to introduce the concept of "aviation noise set index operational card", which will solve the legitimation problem of the aviation noise account in the State Immovable Property Cadaster. Suggestions on equivalent and maximum level magnitude of the sound made at the residential territory of cities and urban-type settlements by flights and aircraft ground operation are given.
Standards are supposed to be harmonized with similar international rules and have to provide zone gradation by 5 dBA.
Suggestions on the considerations of the revealed deficiencies are made, requirements to project sections structure of sanitary protection zones are formulated, proposals on the establishment of aviation noise hygienic standards on the airports aerodrome environs are offered.
About the Authors
O. A. Kartyshev
Civil Aviation Environmental Safety Center
Russian Federation
Candidate of Engineering Sciences, Head of Test Laboratory of “Civil Aviation Environmental Safety Center”
Russian Federation
Candidate of Engineering Sciences, Head of Test Laboratory of “Civil Aviation Environmental Safety Center”
N. I. Nikolaykin
Moscow State Technical University of Civil Aviation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Engineering Sciences, Associate Professor, Professor of Life and Flight Safety Chair of Moscow State Technical University of Civil Aviation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Engineering Sciences, Associate Professor, Professor of Life and Flight Safety Chair of Moscow State Technical University of Civil Aviation
References
1. Postanovlenie Glavnogo gosudarstvennogo sanitarnogo vracha RF ot 25.09.2007 N 74 (red. ot 25.04.2014) [The resolution of the Russian Federation Chief state health officer from 25.09.2007 N 74 (an edition of 25.04.2014)] "O vvedenii v deistvie novoi redaktsii sanitarno-epidemiologicheskikh pravil i normativov SanPiN 2.2.1/2.1.1.1200-03 "Sanitarno-zashchitnye zony i sanitarnaya klassifikatsiya predpriyatii, sooruzhenii i inykh ob’ektov" [About introduction of sanitary and epidemiologic rules and standards of SanPiN 2.2.1/2.1.1.1200-03 "Sanitary protection zones and sanitary classification of the enterprises, constructions and other objects" new edition]. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_74669/ (accessed: 11.02.2017). (in Russian)
2. Sosnin A.S. Kompyuternyie programmyi rascheta zagryazneniya atmosferyi. Obzornaya statya po programmam serii «Ekolog» [The computer programs of the atmosphere pollution calculation. A review according to programs of the «Ecologist» series]. Firma Integral, 2017. Available at: http://www.integral.ru/program.html (accessed: 03.01.2017). (in Russian)
3. Nikolaykina N.E., Nikolaykin N.I., Matyagina A.M. Promyshlennaya ehkologiya: Inzhenernaya zashchita biosfery ot vozdejstviya vozdushnogo transporta [Industrial ecology: Engineering protection of the biosphere from air transport influence]. Moscow, Akademkniga, 2006, 239 p. (in Russian)
4. Smirnov N.N., Chinyuchin Yu.M. Osnovyi teorii tekhnicheskoi ekspluatatsii letatelnyikh apparatov [The theory of aircraft technical operation bases]. Moscow, MSTU CA, 2015, 580 p. (in Russian)
5. Poyasnitelnaya zapiska. Obzor sektora aviatsii [Explanatory note. Sector of aircraft Review]. European Aviation Environmental Report. EASA, 2016, 3 p. Available at: http://www.easa.europa.eu/eaer/system/files/usr_uploaded/EAEr%202016%20Executive%20Summary%20-U.pdf (accessed: 14.02.2017). (in Russian)
6. Nikolaikin N., Nikolaikina N. Ekologicheskaya bezopasnost. Promyshlenno-transportnye i energeticheskie uzlyi [Ecological safety. Industrial and transport and power knots]. Monograph. Saarbrucken, Deutschland, Verlag LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2016, 385 p. (in Russian)
7. Environmental Protection. International Standards and Recommended Practices. Annex 16 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation: Volume 1. Aircraft Noise. Edition 7. ICAO, 2014. Available at: http://www.6pl.ru/asmap/Annexes//an16_v1_cons_ru.pdf (accessed: 03.01.2017).
8. Nikolaikin N.I., Starkov E.Yu. Umenshenie ekologicheskikh posledstviy ot vozdeistviya aviatsionnyikh proisshestviy [Ecological Consequences Reduction from Aviation Accidents Impacts]. Civil Aviation High TECHNOLOGIES, 2016, no 225, pp. 129–136.
9. Starkov E.Yu., Nikolaikin N.I. About Possibility of Aviation Incident Ecological Influences Decrease. XXI century: Resumes of the Past and Challenges of the Present plus, 2016, Issue no. 02 (30), pp. 13–19.
10. GOST 22283-2014. Shum aviatsionnyi. Dopustimye urovni shuma na territorii zhiloi zastroiki i metody ego izmereniya. Mezhgosudarstvennyi standart [Aviation noise. Appropriate noise levels on the territory of residential houses and methods of its measurement]. Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200112157 (accessed: 04.01.2017). (in Russian)
11. Kartyshev O.A. Novyie metodicheskie podkhody k ustanovleniyu razmerov sanitarnozashchitnoi zony i sanitarnyikh razryivov aeroportov grazhdanskoi aviatsii [New methodical approaches to establishment of a sanitary protection zone and sanitary ruptures of the civil aviation airports sizes]. Gigiena i sanitariya [Hygiene and sanitation], 2013, no. 1, pp. 89–92. (in Russian)
12. Ob otmene postanovleniya Glavnogo gosudarstvennogo sanitarnogo vracha Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 02.09.2014 N 52 "Ob utverzhdenii SanPiN 2.2.1/2.1.1.3219-14 "Sanitarno-zashchitnye zony, sanitarnaya klassifikatsiya predpriyatii, sooruzhenii i inykh ob"ektov". Postanovlenie Glavnogo gosudarstvennogo sanitarnogo vracha Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 25.12.2014 no. 90 [About Cancellation of the Russian Federation Chief State Health Officer Resolution from 02.09.2014 no. 52 "About the Statement the SanR&N 2.2.1/2.1.1.3219-14 "Sanitary Protection Zones, Sanitary Classification of the Enterprises, Constructions and Other Objects": Resolution of the Russian Federation State Health Officer Chief of the 25.12.2014 no. 90]. Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/420266523/ (accessed: 04.01.2017). (in Russian)
13. GOST R 53187-2008. Akustika. Shumovoy monitoring gorodskih territoriy [Acoustics. Noise monitoring of urban areas]. M., Standartinform, 2009. Available at: http://www.internet-law.ru/stroyka/doc/554 59/ (accessed: 04.02.2017. (in Russian)
14. Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 Relating to the Assessment and Management of Environmental Noise, 2002. Official Journal of the European Communities, 2002, L 189:12–25.
15. Kartyshev O.A. Postroyeniye zon vozdeystviya aviatsionnogo shuma vblizi aeroportov [Sanitary Zone Definition in the Airport Vicinity on the Base of Aviation Noise Factor]. Scientific Bulletin of MSTU CA, 2010, no. 160, pp. 148–158. (in Russian)
16. The Balanced Approach to Aircraft Management: ICAO Doc 9829 AN/451. 2-d issue. ICAO, 2007. Available at: http://www.aviadocs.net/icaodocs/docs/9829_cons_ru.pdf (accessed: 04.02.2017).
17. Kompleksnoe vozdeistvie faktorov okruzhayushchei sredyi i obraza zhizni na zdorovye naseleniya: diagnostika, korrektsiya, profilaktika: Materialy plenuma Nauchnogo soveta Rossiiskoi Federatsii po ekologii cheloveka i gigiene okruzhayushchei sredy. 11–12 December 2014 [Complex environmental factors impact and way of life on the population health: diagnostics, correction, prevention: Materials of Scientific council of the Russian Federation plenum on the person ecology and environment hygiene. December 11–12, 2014]. Edited by RAS akad. Yu.A. Rakhmanin. Moscow, Taus-Press, 2014, 500 p.
18. Titov A.V. Ekologicheskaya bezopasnost pri proektirovanii, stroitelstve i ekspluatatsii aerodromov [Ecological safety of airfields design, construction and operation]. Nauka i transport. Grazhdanskaya aviatsiya [Science and transport. Civil aviation], 2012, no. 1, pp. 44–46.
Review
For citations:
Kartyshev O.A., Nikolaykin N.I. PROJECTS ON AIRPORTS, AIRFIELDS, HELICOPTER AERODROMES AND LANDING GROUNDS SANITARY PROTECTION AREAS AS THE BASIS OF THEIR ACTIVITY COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT TO ECOLOGICAL REQUIREMENTS. Civil Aviation High Technologies. 2017;20(4):146-155. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26467/2079-0619-2017-20-4-146-155
Views:
1267
Email this article 
