<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">caht</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Научный вестник МГТУ ГА</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Civil Aviation High Technologies</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2079-0619</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2542-0119</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Moscow State Technical University of Civil Aviation (MSTU CA)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">caht-425</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Сохранение имплицитного догматизма в процессе секуляризации</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>THE PRESERVATION OF IMPLICIT DOGMATISM IN SECULARIZATION</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Канаков</surname><given-names>Д. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Kanakov</surname><given-names>D. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">noemail@neicon.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff xml:lang="ru" id="aff-1"><institution>МГУПС (МИИТ)</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2015</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>07</day><month>11</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><issue>215</issue><fpage>69</fpage><lpage>73</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Канаков Д.В., 2016</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2016</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Канаков Д.В.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Kanakov D.V.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://avia.mstuca.ru/jour/article/view/425">https://avia.mstuca.ru/jour/article/view/425</self-uri><abstract><p>Секуляризация в современном обществе носит противоречивый характер: наравне со способствующими секуляризации факторами действуют факторы, сдерживающие этот процесс, укрепляющие позиции религии. Тенденция дедогматизации традиционных исторических форм сопровождается распространением новых синкретических (восточных и западных) культов, пересмотром традиционных религиозных догм, текстов, мифов, наполнением их новым содержанием, попытками модернизировать традиционные религиозные формы, психологически оправдать религию. Утвердившись, эти умонастроения могут трансформироваться в новые формы религиозного догматизма. Сейчас можно констатировать определенные элементы имплицитного догматизма в рамках подобного рода движений.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Secularization in modern society is contradictory. Although there exists factor that contributes to the secularization there are some factors that restrain the processes of the secularization and strengthen the position of religion. The tendency of demagnetization traditional forms is accompanied by the spread of new syncretic (Eastern and Western) cults, a revision of the of traditional religious dogmas, texts, myths and filling them with a new content, attempts to modernize traditional religious forms, psychologically justify religion. Having established that these attitudes can be transformed into new forms of religious dogmatism. Now we can state certain elements of implicit dogmatism inside such movements.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>религиозный догматизм</kwd><kwd>имплицитный догматизм</kwd><kwd>эксплицитный догматизм</kwd><kwd>общество</kwd><kwd>секуляризация</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>religious dogmatism</kwd><kwd>implicit dogmatism</kwd><kwd>explicit dogmatism</kwd><kwd>society</kwd><kwd>secularization</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Узланер Д.А. «Постсекулярное»: ставим проблему // Русский журнал. 2009. 17 сентября 2009г. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.russ.ru/pole/Postsekulyarnoe-stavim-problemu (дата обращения: 27.10.2013).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Uzlaner D.A. «Postsekuljarnoe»: stavim problemu (2009). URL: http://www.russ.ru/pole/Postsekulyarnoestavim-problemu (accessed 27.10. 2014). (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хабермас Ю., Ратцингер Й. (Бенедикт XVI). Диалектика секуляризации. М.: Библейско-богословский ин-т св. апостола Андрея, 2006. 112 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Habermas Ju., Ratcinger J. (Benedikt XVI). Dialektika sekuljarizacii. M.: St. Andrew’s Biblecal Teological Institute. 2006. 112 р. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Угринович Д.М. Введение в религиоведение. М: Мысль, 1985. 270 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ugrinovich D.M. Vvedenie v religiovedenie. M.: Mysl'. 1985. 270 р. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Декларация о ликвидации всех форм нетерпимости и дискриминации на основе религии или убеждений, принятая резолюцией 35/55 Генеральной Ассамблеей ООН в от 25 ноября 1981г. (A/RES/36/55) // Веб-сайт ООН. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/declarations/relintol.shtml (дата обращения: 07.10.2012).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Deklaracija o likvidacii vseh form neterpimosti i diskriminacii na osnove religii ili ubezhdenij, prinjatаj rezoljuciej 35/55 General'noj Assambleej OON v ot 25 nojabrja 1981 g. (A/RES/36/55). URL: http://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/declarations/relintol.shtml (accessed 07.10. 2013).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Juergensmeyer M. Introduction: Religious Ambivalence to Global Civil Society // Religion in global civil society / Ed. by Juergensmeyer M. Oxford [etc.]: Oxford univ. press, 2005. Рр. 4-5.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Juergensmeyer M. Introduction: Religious Ambivalence to Global Civil Society. Religion in global civil society. Ed. by Juergensmeyer M. Oxford [etc.]: Oxford univ. press. 2005. Рр. 4-5.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Религия и глобализация на просторах Евразии. М.: Российская политическая энциклопедия (РОССПЭН); Моск. центр Карнеги, 2009. 341 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Religija i globalizacija na prostorah Evrazii. M.: Russian political encyclopedia (ROSSPEN Publisher), The Carnegie Moscow Center. 2009. 341 p. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шохин В.К. «Диалог религий»: идеология и практика // Альфа и Омега. 1997. № 1 (12). С. 281-295.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shohin V.K. «Dialog religij»: ideologija i praktika. Al'fa i Omega. 1997. № 1 (12). Pp. 281-295. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шохин В.К. «Диалог религий»: идеология и практика (Окончание) // Альфа и Омега. 1997. № 2 (13). С. 223-240.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shohin V.K. «Dialog religij»: ideologija i praktika (Okonchanie). Al'fa i Omega. 1997. № 2 (13). Pp. 223-240. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ратцингер Й. (Бенедикт XVI). Многообразие религий и единый завет. М.: Библейско-богословский ин-т св. апостола Андрея, 2007. 130 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ratcinger J. (Benedikt XVI). Mnogoobrazie religij i edinyj zavet. M.: St. Andrew’s Biblecal Teological Institute. 2007. 130 p. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Francis L.J., Robbins M. Christianity and dogmatism among undergraduate students // Journal of Beliefs &amp; Values. 2003. Vol. 24. № 1. Pр. 89-95.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Francis L.J., Robbins M. Christianity and dogmatism among undergraduate students. Journal of Beliefs &amp; Values. 2003. Vol. 24. № 1. Pр. 89-95.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Francis L.J. Measuring attitude towards Christianity during childhood and adolescence // Personality and Individual Differences. 1989. Vol. 10. № 6. Рр. 695-698.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Francis L.J. Measuring attitude towards Christianity during childhood and adolescence. Personality and Individual Differences. 1989. Vol. 10. № 6. Рр. 695-698.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">McNeel S.P., Thorsen P.L. A Developmental Perspective on Christian Faith and Dogmatism // High School Journal. 1985. Vol. 68. № 3. Authoritarianism and Dogmatism. Part 1 / February-March 1985. Pр. 211-220.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">McNeel S.P., Thorsen P.L. A Developmental Perspective on Christian Faith and Dogmatism. High School Journal. 1985. Vol. 68. № 3. Authoritarianism and Dogmatism. Part 1. February-March 1985. Pр. 211-220.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ray J.J. The development and validation of a balanced dogmatism scale // Australian Journal of Psychology. 1970. Vol. 22. № 3 / December 1970. Pр. 253-260.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ray J.J. The development and validation of a balanced dogmatism scale. Australian Journal of Psychology. 1970. Vol. 22. № 3. December 1970. Pр. 253-260.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
